![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Effective debt collection starts with being careful to whom debt is extended.
Credit reporting agencies or credit bureaus, collect information about consumers' financial affairs and sell that information to their business members, such as credit grantors, employers and insurance companies. The credit bureaus charge annual fees as well as a fee for each credit report requested by members.
In Canada, there are three major credit bureaus: Equifax Canada, NCB Inc. and TransUnion Canada
Most
national and international creditors, such as banks and department stores,
are registered with all bureaus, so the chances are good that whatever
shows up on one credit report will also appear on the others.
Credit
bureaus obtain their information from three major sources:
1. Consumers supply information, primarily from filling out application forms for credit.
2. Public records provide information on such matters as bankruptcies, Court judgements, foreclosures and agreements registered with Provincial authorities.
3. The major credit grantors and collection agencies send their credit files electronically to the credit bureau every month, resulting in files that include the account number, outstanding balance, and a nine point scale indicating whether a payment was made on time or late.
The nine point scale is as follows:
0 Too new to rate; approved but not used.
1 Pays (or paid) within 30 days
of billing; pays account as agreed.
2 Pays (or paid) in more than 30
days, but not more than 60 days, or one payment past due.
3 Pays (or paid) in more than 60
days, but not more than 90 days, or two payments past due.
4 Pays (or paid) in more than 90
days, but not more than 120 days, or three or more payments past due.
5 Account is at least 120 days overdue,
but is not yet rated 9.
6. (Code 6 does not exist.)
7 Making regular payments under
a consolidation order or similar arrangement.
8 Repossession (indicate if it is
a voluntary return of merchandise by the consumer).
9 Bad debt; placed for collection;
skip.
The
FICO® score
The
FICO® score, developed by Fair, Isaac (the pioneer in credit scoring)
is a number between 300 and 850. A FICO® score is a snapshot of a
person's credit rating at a particular point in time. The higher the FICO® score the the better the credit rating.
Reporting
Standards
Credit Bureaus share information within a system known as the National
Equifax Network. The network observes strict standards governing reporting
of adverse information and purging of credit
reporting records. The credit bureau must investigate and use its best
efforts to confirm disputed negative information.
A consumer
has a right to full disclosure of the content and the source of any information
on his or her file. The Registrar of Credit Reporting Agencies recognizes
that all complainants consider their
issues to be very serious. For that reason the Credit Reporting Branch
insists that credit reporting agencies and creditors provide prompt and
complete reports to the consumer about adverse credit information.
Credit
Reporting Acts Protect Several Rights of Consumers:
The action a creditor can take, in the case of a default on a loan, or money owed for goods or services supplied, to recover the monies owed to him will depend on the security the creditor has or the class of creditor he is.
A creditor with security has the strongest position of any creditor because he has the right to realize on his security or seize the assets covered by his security to repay the debt. A creditor may have the following security:
Foreclosure is defined as that action that a lender will take to repossess and sell a piece of property for defaults in mortgage payments.
The usual procedure is for the mortgage holder to hire a lawyer to commence the foreclosure procedure. A current valuation or an appraisal of the property is made to establish the value.
Depending on the equity in the property or the anticipated shortfall, the lawyer, on behalf of the mortgage holder, will seek from the court an appropriate redemption period. i.e. the period of time the court will establish for which the property will be for sale before the owner will have to vacate and the time which potentially the mortgage holder can take control of the property.
If there is a significant anticipated shortfall the lawyer for the mortgage holder will argue for no redemption period. If there is anticipated equity then the owner of the property will ask the court for a longer redemption period so the property can be sold in an orderly manner and not as a "fire sale", thus allowing the owner to sell for as high a price as possible and therefore not suffer a loss or worse a shortfall. Typically the courts will grant a 6 month redemption period.
Conduct of Sale is also a key issue. The court can grant conduct of sale to the owner or the mortgage holder usually dependent on the length of the redemption period.
When a satisfactory offer has been received for the property the offer will be taken to court by the lawyer for the mortgage holder so the court can approve the sale.
If there is a shortfall the mortgage holder will look to the owner to make up the shortfall.
The creditor who has this type of security should consult with a lawyer to ensure that the correct steps in the realization procedure have been followed. For example, 10 days notice for repayment must be given before an Agent or Receiver can be appointed to realize on the security (Section 244 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act). In exceptional circumstances and with the approval of the court this notice period can be shortened. This period can also be shortened if the debtor waives the 10 day notice period.
This type of security is covered under the Personal Property Security Acts of the provinces. It is security that a person takes in property, such as inventory, that secures payment with regard to those assets of all or part of its purchase price.
This type of security can be realized on but again a lawyer should be consulted to ensure the proper realization steps have been taken.
This type of security is usually realized by utilizing a bailiff to seize the asset(s). Care should be exercised and perhaps a lawyer should be consulted to ensure the proper steps have been followed. For example, in BC, when seizing a vehicle that is personal property (i.e. property belonging to an individual and not a corporate entity) there is a "Seize of Sue" clause in effect. This has the effect that the creditor can seize or sue but not both. Therefore, if a vehicle is seized and then sold and there is a shortfall the creditor cannot pursue the debtor to make up the shortfall.
The Bank Act has a provision which allows Banks to take inventory as security. This security also gives the bank the right to collect receivables that arose because of the sale of that inventory.
This type of security is usually taken by banks and is security covering the business's Accounts Receivables.
Landlords have special rights granted them by the clauses in the lease they sign with the tenant and by the laws of their province. For example, in BC the Commercial Tenancy Act, gives a landlord the right to Distrain or the seize the assets on the premises for payment of rental arrears. The landlord's right to seize assets covers all the assets except those assets secured by certain creditors. A lawyer should be consulted to ensure the proper steps are taken to realize on a Rent Distraint.
Government creditors have special rights as they are in the enviable position of being able to get specific collection laws enacted with much more ease than other creditors.
They rank before other creditors in the case of commercial debt for arrears of withholding taxes and collections of GST. In the case of student loans they have lobbied to have a special draconian law passed so that student loans, no matter what the hardship is, cannot be erased by bankruptcy unless the debtor has been out of school for 10 years.
NOTE: Please check with a lawyer if the debt in question is significant. The law can change at any time, especially the law affecting the CRA. CRA has the habit of rewriting the law whenever a court decision goes against them.
The Federal Government and the Provinces have Limitation Acts which provide a limit on the time an unsecured debt survives. If an unsecured debt is not collected or payments are not made on the unsecured debt then after a certain time no legal action can be taken to collect the debt.
A
March 4, 2003 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, Markevich v.
The Queen decided that limitations applied to CCRA as well as other
Crown proceedings. Section 32 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings
Act and Section 3 (5) of the BC Limitation Act barred collection
of the Federal and Provincial portions of the debt since the debt was
more than 6 years old. This decision was "overruled" when parliament amended section 222 of the Income Tax Act to provide for a 10 year limitation period.
Collins v. Canada, 2005 FCA 1431 CanLII.
Examples from various provinces and the Federal Government:
Unsecured creditors have remedies which go from the relatively inexpensive to the more difficult and more expensive:
Generally speaking, the Act is intended to operate for the benefit of both bankrupts and their creditors. While the Act is not intended for use as a tool for collection of individual debts, in certain circumstances that use is permitted.
In petitioning a debtor one has to retain a lawyer to prepare the necessary documents, attend to service and seek the Receiving Order before the Registrar in Bankruptcy or a Judge in Chambers. The petitioning creditor must also make arrangements for a Trustee to act and may be liable for payment of the costs incurred by the Trustee where realizations are insufficient for that purpose. To avert such a prospect, arrangements are usually made to limit the petitioning creditor's obligation to the Trustee to the amount of an agreed "retainer".
Before deciding to launch a Petition the following should be considered:
- The existence and amounts of preferred claims that may rank in priority; (NOTE: the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, effective November 30, 1992, did away with the preferred status for statutory creditors such as Revenue Canada Taxation, provincial and federal government claims.)
- The quantum of unsecured claims which may rank pari passu;
- The occurrence of preferences, reviewable transactions and/or settlements within the three month to five year review periods prior to the filing of your Petition;
- Your receipt of payments beyond the "usual" amounts within the three months prior to filing of your Petition; and
- The validity of any security you may hold.
- There are certain instances where petitions for Receiving Orders are particularly potent tools. Some of them are the following:
- Where the debtor has transferred property to another individual without fair consideration, such as transfer of house to related party for $1.00, settlement of debt, such as transfer of RRSP to insurance company or to prefer one creditor over all others;
- Where your debtor does not wish to lose a particular element of his property (a yacht, exotic car, shares in a Company, etc.) or does not wish his affairs and dealings to be scrutinized by a Trustee and/or his creditors;
- Where your debtor anticipates receipt of an inheritance;
- Where you are dealing with a debtor who needs to be a Director or Officer of one or more Companies. The interaction of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Company Act result in such a person ceasing to be a Director and ceasing to be eligible to be an Officer upon being adjudged bankrupt;
- Where you are dealing with a debtor who may lose or have modified his professional accreditation as a result of being adjudged bankrupt; or
- Where your debtor is a person who is always "dealing" and doesn't wish to disclose his status as an undischarged bankrupt when entering upon negotiations or where he might lose the benefit of a particular contract, lease or business prospect by being adjudged bankrupt.
Unsecured creditors, when realizing on security pursuant to a judgement, and not security held, cannot seize certain assets protected by provincial or territorial law. The assets protected from seizure vary with the province or territory. The assets protected from seizure, are the same assets protected in the event of a bankruptcy and are listed by jurisdiction at this site.
By law, all actions against a bankrupt must cease once the documents are filed. This does not apply to secured creditors such as banks holding, for example, a lien on a car.
It does apply to a landlord who is in the process of a rent distraint. It also, in the case of filing a Proposal, pursuant to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, prevents a secured creditor from realizing on his security until the proposal has been dealt with.
Funds in court seized by a creditor pursuant to a garnishment, after judgement, will be taken by the Trustee.
Filing Small Claims Actions Online
Personal Property Security Acts
Personal Property Security Acts (PPSA) are registries set up in certain provinces (Ontario, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Saskatchewan, British Columbia, Newfoundland, Northwest Territories, Manitoba and Yukon), at which secured creditors register the security interest the have in assets of the company or person they lent money to.
Registration serves as a public notice that the interest exists against the collateral.
PPSA's do not provide for registration of all secured assets. For example, the BC registry does not accept builders or warehousemen liens, judgments, real property mortgages, or motor vehicle ownership.
Manitoba Personal Property Registry